Derek Longmuir presented ThoughtWorks QTB on working with legacy systems. You can see the video and slides on InfoQ.
I like the definition given by Michael Feathers:
Legacy code is simply code without tests.
Legacy Systems have Value. They are usually business critical and feature rich. They may even be stable and reliable (YMMV). Hint: in the MindMap below, start at 3 o’clock and go clockwise.
Why change from a legacy system? There are number of good reasons: obsolete technology, can’t add features, system is fragile.
This is an important problem since most systems we have 10% of the effort to build and 90% effort to maintain. So to manage costs, we need maintainable systems.
What to do? Traditional approaches such as Big Bang (think explosion) and wrapping/hiding legacy systems rarely achieve business objectives.
Do a system health check. Look at the code. Get complexity measures. Look at test code ratio. What state is the system in?
Before getting started, there are some tools that you will need for basic technical hygiene. The equivalent of brushing and flossing your teeth is test and build automation.
How to tackle this?
With the Strangler approach, the goal is to strangle the existing application by building a new system that runs in parallel. The idea is to put a new interface in place and begin migrating the functionality in a piecewise fashion. This approach takes a lot of effort and makes sense when there is no hope for the existing code base.
The Phased approach is about rehabilitating the system piece by piece. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.
Strangely, there was no mention of the bible on this topic: Working Effectively with Legacy Code by Michael Feathers. This book is a must-read on this topic. As is Refactoring, Refactoring to Patterns, and Clean Code.
Agile Failure , Backlog Grooming , Conference , Legacy Code , Lululemon , Product Strategy , Technical Debt , Technical Practices , ThoughtWorks